November 1, 2008

Obama’s Henchmen and the Rise of Commufascism:

By Shawn D. Akers

Whether it was Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany or Vladimir Lenin in Communist Russia, the pattern is largely the same – totalitarian dictators come to power by enshrining themselves as cults of personality and then creating political monopolies through often less than delicate campaigns of indoctrination and censorship – especially censorship enshrouded in the intimidating aura of state power.

Ironically, these cloven-tongued leaders often rise to dominance by preaching power to those they will dominate, provision to those they will impoverish, and liberty to those they will force into state labor.  Whether they claim to be left or right, revolutionary or reactionary, communist or fascist, the result is always the same – tyranny.

The great discomfort for many Americans as they watch the current presidential contest is that the scent of such totalitarianism hangs heavy in the air; the pattern so familiar in European dictatorships seems eerily present in Barack Obama’s presidential campaign.   Senator Obama, obviously intelligent and gifted with enviable powers of communication, has for all of his eloquence, done very little in the real world other than campaign for office.

His supporters can not tell you what he has done that qualifies him to run the most powerful nation the world has ever known, but they know he was born for the job – they were there at the convention; they heard the speech; they felt the magic; chills ran up their legs, and they cried their eyelashes off as Mr. Obama stood tall between the ivory columns of a Greek temple to accept his party’s nomination for President of the United States.

If there was any remaining question of his revolutionary greatness, scattered around the nation are tri-color campaign posters of Mr. Obama, bearing a striking resemblance to the larger than life representations of Lenin, Marx, and Engels used by Soviet propagandists in the glory days of Mother Russia.  These communist styled knock-offs featuring Mr. Obama staring nobly – if melodramatically – into the distance and emblazoned with one-word utopian mantras such as “Change,” “Progress,” or “Hope,” were designed by Shepard Fairey whose obsession with communist propaganda overflows in his “OBEY” brand website which brandishes a Cyrillic-styled banner that reads “Propaganda Engineering” and boasts the company motto “Manufacturing Quality Dissent Since 1989.” 

Whatever else may be said, Mr. Obama’s personality cult campaign has been an unmitigated success, creating, almost ex nihilo, a “beloved leader” out of a largely inexperienced and unknown man, void of business, executive, and foreign policy credentials.

This fact alone is cause for substantial concern, but unfortunately for the American people, what has been true of the form of the Obama campaign is now materializing in its function as individuals cloaked in the appearance of state authority seek to silence dissent and indoctrinate the masses.

The largest portion of the media has progressed in its leftist agenda so overtly in the current presidential race that we are hardly surprised when television news “anchors” swoon at the very mention of Barack Obama while taking every opportunity to belittle Governor Sarah Palin, feigning objectivity and savoring superiority all the while.

Far more troubling is when individuals holding powerful public posts – police officers, prosecutors, and others who by the power of their offices, can strip citizens of their liberty – use their positions to intimidate anyone who dares speak against Mr. Obama.

Missouri prosecutor Bob McCulloch took to the air waives, and placed the public on notice that as members of Mr. Obama’s “truth squad” he and other Missouri prosecutors and law enforcement officials plan to “respond immediately” to any critical speech concerning Mr. Obama that “might violate Missouri ethics laws.” The message was crystal clear: “Speak out against our beloved leader and all the fury of the state will fall on you.”

McCulloch has since claimed that he was speaking only in his personal capacity – a strange assertion considering that he has no personal capacity to respond to violations of Missouri’s ethics laws.

The shocking willingness of the Obama campaign to begin using state power, or at least the appearance of state power, to censor dissent even before Mr. Obama holds the actual power he seeks, is especially troubling when combined with actions of other individuals who use their taxpayer funded positions of power to indoctrinate “the masses” in favor of Mr. Obama.

Only weeks ago, Janna Barber had the courage to expose what is apparently all too common in public universities – professors, paid with taxpayer funds, using their positions of considerable power and influence to force feed pro-Obama political dogma to their students.  Professor Andrew Hallam of Metropolitan State College of Denver did for the classroom what Shepard Fairey did for political posters.

In true Nazi-Reichsführer-school-meets-Communist-Reeducation-Camp style, Hallam brought party fanaticism and inexcusable psychological abuse to bear on his class, demanding that his English students write a searing anti-Palin position paper, requiring the Republican students to self-identify, and then allowing if not encouraging the accepting, and politically correct Democratic students to verbally berate and abuse the handful of Republicans with language that would have made Stalin blush.

Whether it’s University of Massachusetts Chaplin Kent Higgins attempting to use official university action by providing college credit for Obama campaigners, or PBS ensuring that the vice presidential debate is moderated by an open, ardent Obama supporter whose success as an author is dependent on Obama’s victory, the actions taken together amount to a “forced coordination” – what the Nazis referred to as Gleichschaltung.

If this happens in an Obama presidential campaign, one can only shudder to think of the impact of an Obama administration.  These are the ways of those who do by brute force what they cannot do by the force of their ideas. Attempts at tyranny have historically struck a sour note in the collective soul of Americans.

This may be the most important election in recent American history, and we owe it to ourselves and our children to choose leaders who will not tolerate tyranny much less partake in it.

Shawn D. Akers is the Director of Academic Support and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Law at Liberty University School of Law.

Editor’s Note: The views and opinions of contributors are their own, and are not necessarily those of Sage Commentary.