February 28, 2013

Holy Land Conflict — No Peace Among Wolves

By Matt Barber

At times, complicated issues are most clearly understood in simple terms. Speaking before the Knesset in 2006, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu captured, in two brief sentences, that which lies at the heart of the ongoing, centuries-old Arab-Israeli conflict: “The truth is that if Israel were to put down its arms, there would be no more Israel. If the Arabs were to put down their arms, there would be no more war.”

Indeed, how does one peacefully co-exist with those whose singular obsession is that one should not exist at all? Can a Jewish people who simply wish to live in peace ever do so while surrounded by those who view them as, in the words of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, “a cancerous tumor” – “the most detested people in all humanity” whose very nation must be “wiped out from the map?”

But according to the burgeoning worldwide Islamic caliphate, it’s not just Israel, the “Little Satan,” that must face inhalation. So too must America, the “Big Satan,” be destroyed: “And God willing, with the force of God behind it,” Ahmadinejad once promised, “we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism.”

A nuclear-armed Iran is perhaps months away. It is folly most grave to believe that this Islamic regime – a regime which holds that there can be no greater honor than to destroy both Israel and America via nuclear suicide bombings – won’t deploy such weaponry at the earliest possible opportunity.

Yet today’s anti-Semitic axis-of-the-willfully-blind – the liberal intelligentsia, rank-and-file “progressives”, and that elusive creature; the “moderate Muslim” – inexplicably, if not unwittingly, rally behind the principal Islamic cause: Death to the infidels (Quran 9.5).

“Free occupied Palestine!” they drone, while either disregarding the long history of deadly Arab aggression in the region, or laboring under obtuse ignorance of it.

By “occupied Palestine,” of course, Arabs and Arab sympathizers reference that portion of Israel achieved as spoils of her defensive “Six Day War.” In June of 1967, the tiny Jewish nation devastated the armies of neighboring Syria, Jordan and Egypt as the warring nations characteristically made ready to “wipe Israel from the map.”

By seizing the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the Old City of Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and the West Bank of the Jordan River, Israel had gained a defensive stronghold in the region crucial to her very survival. Still, many of these territories remained very much occupied – and do to this day – by thousands of Arabs who now fall under Israeli governance.

Therein lies the struggle.

So, in truth, Israel no more occupies this fictional “Palestine” than do Californians “occupy” Sacramento.

Yet imagine the Mexican government launching dozens of rockets each day, for years, into Los Angeles neighborhoods, intentionally targeting innocent American citizens.

Or visualize a Mexican suicide bomber with full government authority strolling into a crowded Toys “R” Us in suburban Bakersfield, ripping himself and dozens of women and children to shreds.

Picture, if you will, a quiet, unassuming woman cleverly disguised as an expectant mother boarding a San Francisco trolley and blowing it up along with scores of innocent passengers.

Do you not think the international community would forcefully condemn such horrific acts of terror? Do you not think America would respond with that level of force necessary to eliminate the threat? Would she not have an absolute right – indeed an absolute duty to do so?

Of course she would.

Yet, despite a recent fragile cease-fire which Hamas violated within hours, this is exactly what peace-loving Israelis face each day. This is their reality.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority – with Iran’s full economic and military backing – have been attacking innocent Israeli citizens in this very fashion for years, recently ramping up such attacks.

The only wonder is that Israel has shown such remarkable restraint in her response.

But respond she has.

“Iran has turned Gaza into an outpost of their nation,” Michael Oren, Israeli ambassador to the U.S. recently told a group of Christian leaders in a special briefing convened by Liberty Counsel. “More than 5.5 million of our citizens are now under threat of missile attack, and over 1,300 missiles have been fired at us since we took action against Hamas.”  

To be sure, no reasonable, peace-loving person should have any sympathy whatsoever for the Iranian government, Hamas or the Palestinian Authority – all guilty of serial war crimes.

Indeed, we all mourn the tragic loss of innocent Arab life in Gaza and anywhere else it occurs. So do the Israeli people. So does the Israeli government.

That’s what separates the good from the evil.

Yet it is the Arab authorities who bathe in the blood of innocents. Responsibility for these deaths rests solely at the feet of those wicked men who intentionally shield themselves behind their own women and children – who deliberately place military launch sites and terrorist headquarters next to mosques, homes, playgrounds and the like.

They attack innocent Israelis and then shamelessly cower behind these human shields – their own people – as their intended victims answer back with pinpoint strikes against terrorists and military personnel.

It is purposeful. It is propaganda. And it works.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir once said: “Peace will come to the Middle East when the Arabs love their children more than they hate us.”

But alas, their hate burns hot.

Like wild dogs, the Arab nations remain willing to eat their own young if it serves their evil ends.

And like wild dogs they encircle Israel, the Mountain Gazelle, intending to devour her.

And so she fights for her life.

Matt Barber is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He also serves as Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action.

[Editor’s Note: The opinions and views expressed by guest contributors in articles submitted for publication in the Sage Commentary or Sage Views sections are those of the author and are not necessarily the opinions and views of Sage Commentary]

Views of the Country

By Donald G. Mashburn

Looming Budget Cuts

President Obama continues his effort to get us and the Congress to believe the looming budget cuts will bring on just about every disaster imaginable, short of Armageddon. Perhaps if more of his advisors and supporters believed in Armageddon we might have heard about that too.

Voters with memories should note that neither the president nor his advisors mention that the national debt has soared to more than $16.4 trillion on Obama’s watch.

To most of us, having to tighten our belt some 2 percent isn’t all that difficult, but the president is frantically trying to get us to believe that trimming $85 billion from a $3.6 trillion budget will cause economic havoc across the country. One insightful editorial cartoonist put the “fiscal cliff” crisis in perspective by showing a tiny bee flying toward the windshield of a truck severely overloaded with “national debt,” and the driver, President Obama, screaming, “we’re gonna die!”

The president hasn’t made that charge, yet. But his claims are embarrassingly false when he warns of huge layoffs of teachers, air traffic controllers, and other essential workers, and the closure of airports, grounding of airlines, etc.

The StarTribune.com put the crisis in perspective by asking, “What’s the big deal?”

The editorial went on to say, “The $85 billion in automatic cuts set to take place over the remainder of the year are but a thin slice of overall federal spending. Over the next decade, the annual cuts put in place by the bipartisan 2011 debt-ceiling deal — a process known as “sequestration” — are projected to reduce federal spending by just 2.4 percent, according to an analysis by the conservative Heritage Foundation.

“To families, businesses, and state and local government officials who adjusted to the Great Recession’s lean times, it could seem like the federal government is getting off easy. 𠇋ig whoop,” tweeted one skeptical Minnesota lawmaker last weekend.”

If someone could only explain that to the president, he could calm down enough to deal with the fiscal issues facing the nation, instead of having to seek the calming environs of the golf course between public utterances of coming disasters.